Why a “Clean” CR Is Bad News—and Why a Shutdown Is Worse (Plus the Scenario Plan You Need)

September 23, 2025

A clean continuing resolution (CR) keeps the lights on but leaves grants in limbo—no fresh policy direction, delayed NOFOs, compressed timelines later, and “no new starts.” A shutdown is worse: halted program operations at many agencies, frozen obligations, delayed reimbursements, and cascading risk for states, locals, and subrecipients. The fix isn’t waiting—it’s scenario planning now, with a CR-mode calendar and a shutdown playbook you can run on day one.

Why a CR hurts recipients (even when it’s “clean”)

• No policy signal: No full-year appropriations = no updated priorities or guidance.
• NOFO slippage → compressed windows: Post-CR backlog creates shorter, riskier timelines.
• No new starts / limited expansions: Fewer competitive opportunities and slow pass-throughs.
• Budget ambiguity: Unclear match/indirects and cautious apportionments depress obligations.
• Cash flow frictions: Trickle funding slows drawdowns and reimbursements.

• Program pause: Many program staff are furloughed; application reviews, awards, modifications, and help desks stall.
• Obligations freeze: New obligations often halt; “no-cost” actions may queue up until reopening.
• Reimbursements delay: Payment processing can slow or stop, stressing grantee cash positions and vendor payments.
• Pass-through ripple: States can’t push funds until feds move; subrecipients (often small orgs) face the biggest strain.
• Procurement & performance risk: Schedules slide, change orders pile up, and cost escalations follow.
• Equity impacts widen: Smaller and rural applicants lose the most ground when windows compress later.

The scenario plan: protect operations under CR or shutdown

1) Stand up an “Appropriations War Room”

• Weekly (or more) cadence: finance, grants, legal, procurement, programs.
• One owner for decisions, dashboards, and external comms.

2) Build three time-based scenarios

• Short (1–2 weeks): Minor slippage; conserve cash; hold timelines with small buffers.

• Medium (3–8 weeks): Delay major procurements; activate vendor/subrecipient communications; resequence milestones.

• Long (9+ weeks): Scope deferrals; freeze nonessential starts; trigger contingency funding or bridge loans (if allowed); prepare budget amendments.

3) Quantify exposure (simple matrix)

Create an award-by-award sheet with:

• Obligation Status: Indicate whether each award is funded or pending.

• Cash Position: Track days on hand without reimbursements to monitor liquidity.

• Critical Path: Identify milestones at risk within the next 30, 60, and 90 days.

• Dependency Flags: Highlight any federal approvals or federal staff touchpoints required.

• Subrecipient Risk: Assess subrecipient working capital and reporting cadence.

• Contractual Risk: Note any stop-work clauses, liquidated damages, or escalation clauses that could affect execution.

• Notes/Comments: Include any additional context or action items relevant to the award’s status or risks.

4) Cash management moves

• Increase Reimbursement Frequency: Act now to avoid back-loaded draws.

• Pre-Clear Documentation: Maintain a drawdown evidence index including reason codes, contracts/POs, performance proof, and GL & SEFA crosswalk.

• Bridge Funding Options: Identify legal/allowable options and define repayment mechanics.

5) Portfolio resequencing

• Prioritize Awards: Focus on awards with obligations already in place and low federal touch.

• De-Risk Capital Schedules: Manage bid periods and NTP dates to avoid shutdown windows.

• Pre-Write Modifications: Prepare modification requests and no-cost extensions in advance so they’re ready to send as soon as agencies reopen.

6) Procurement & contracts

• Lock Conflict Disclosures and Method Memos: Complete early to avoid delays.

• Add Contingency Language: Include provisions for schedule slippage and confirm price-hold periods.

• Stage Procurements: Plan timing to avoid awards during likely shutdown windows.

• Leverage Cooperative Purchasing: Use to accelerate the procurement process

7) Subrecipient support

• Share One-Page Shutdown FAQ: Cover cash timing, reporting, and communications.

• Offer Office Hours and Templates: Provide guidance and consider micro-advances where permitted.

• Protect Equity: Monitor awards or staff at risk of being affected by compressed windows later.

8) Communications & records

• Prepare Executive Talking Points: Clearly outline what’s paused, what’s proceeding, and why.

• Maintain Contemporaneous Memos: Document assumptions, eligibility interpretations, and re-sequencing decisions to create an audit trail.

What to do this month (10 actions you can finish fast)

1. Publish a CR-mode calendar with forecast-to-NOFO slippage and “prep-by” dates.
2. Approve a strict Go/No-Go rubric (fit, resident alignment, match, capacity, compliance risk).
3. Pre-assemble readiness kits (letters, MOUs, resumes, maps, cost methods, procurement plan).
4. Reconcile to GL/SEFA; fix file hygiene before bandwidth gets tight.
5. Move to biweekly reimbursements; clear old items.
6. Build the exposure matrix for all active awards.
7. Draft no-cost extension templates and change-order language.
8. Brief subrecipients; set realistic reporting cadences.
9. Identify priority projects to finish early; document substantial completion criteria.
10. Schedule a post-reopening sprint plan (who hits send, on what, day 1).

Bottom line

A CR reduces shutdown risk but raises execution risk. A shutdown compounds everything: operations, obligations, reimbursements, and equity. The jurisdictions that win will front-load prep, run a three-horizon scenario plan, and keep cash and compliance tight so they can surge the minute Washington moves.

Managing grants efficiently, without compromising compliance and integrity, can be a challenging task. If your organization is navigating the complexities of grant management, we can help you enhance oversight, streamline processes, ensure outcomes and reduce the risks of waste, fraud, and abuse. Reach out today to learn how our expertise in grants management can ensure your programs meet their goals, stay compliant, and make the best use of taxpayer dollars. 

Authored by: